On Wed, May 4, 2011 at 12:44 AM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[email protected]> wrote: > Grigorios Bouzakis <[email protected]> wrote: >> Seblu wrote: >>> On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Grigorios Bouzakis <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>>> Kwpolska <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> (a reprint of FS#24074) >>>>>> The initscripts' /etc/rc.d/functions uses colors with a black >>>>>> background. It does not look very nice on a transparent black >>>>>> terminal. A patch is included. >>>>> >>>>> tomegun requested a git patch to be sent here. It's in the >>>>> attachments section. >>>> >>>> See: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/17225 >>> Closed as duplicate. >>> >>>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186 >>> Close because issue is resolved. >>> >>>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996 >>> Closed bevause issue is not present. >>>> >>> >>> But i agree with greg an issue present. Just run rc with a white term >>> (what should be banned). >>> >>> I don't have tested his patch, but it looks good. This is a well know >>> error with coloring term. >> >> The patch reverts the one from https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/1186 so it >> doesnt really look good. >> As Aaron said in https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996#comment53730 for >> a slightly different patch: >> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996?getfile=4307 >> "The current choices are: unreadable text on white backgrounds, or an >> unattractive black block. I'll go with the unattractive and READABLE >> choice here." https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16996#comment53730 which >> applies >> to this patch as well. > > Errm sorry got carried away. The proposed patch is not entirely the same > as any of the previous ones.
But it's still doesn't solve the issue. I will propose one. -- Sébastien Luttringer www.seblu.net
