On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: > Correct. We can still optionally configure it, but the default should be > what I do in my patch. We could combine Eric's and my patch.
By Eric, do you mean Gerardo? Anyone want to resubmit a combination? > Right now, netcfg doesn't have a way to configure the broadcast either, > and just computes it automatically. > > > Do you have a use case where the broadcast is not the last address in > the subnet? I haven't seen this. I'll let Dave asses whether or not this (setting a non-standard broadcast) is something we actually want to support -t
