Am 09.06.2011 18:58, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 6:35 PM, Thomas Bächler <[email protected]> wrote: >> Correct. We can still optionally configure it, but the default should be >> what I do in my patch. We could combine Eric's and my patch. > > By Eric, do you mean Gerardo? Anyone want to resubmit a combination?
Yes, Gerardo, of course. I somehow confused the submitter. >> Right now, netcfg doesn't have a way to configure the broadcast either, >> and just computes it automatically. >> >> >> Do you have a use case where the broadcast is not the last address in >> the subnet? I haven't seen this. > > > I'll let Dave asses whether or not this (setting a non-standard > broadcast) is something we actually want to support We should add an analogous patch to netcfg, so we ensure netcfg doesn't have less features than initscripts (right now, netcfg always uses 'broadcast +').
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
