On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 9:10 PM, Dave Reisner <[email protected]> wrote: > That's half the solution -- as mentioned in the commit message, path_id > and usb_id needs to be removed from install/udev as well.
Ah, I missed those. I guess they could be done in a separate commit, I'll try to remember. > <rant> this seems like upstream is moving a binary for the sake of > moving a binary. there's no rationale given in the commit message or the > NEWS. grrrr. </rant> My guess at a rationale (I agree that it would be nice to put that in the change log): the user-facing interface to udev is udevadm, not udevd. A user should never need to call it, so it should not be in PATH. This is similar to how other daemons are stored in libexecdir and not in bindir (upower/udisks). Sounds fine by me. -t
