On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 10:01 AM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 1:47 AM, Tom Gundersen <[email protected]> wrote: >> I don't think we should add hacks to our packages to allow things that >> are not supported by upstream. The proper solution to this would be to >> file a feature request against udevadm, and in the meantime keep some >> script that does what you want (if it can be done). Agreed- can you point me to the udev bug tracker so I can file said request?
> If it turns out that restarting udevd is indeed the correct thing to > do on upgrade, then we should just do that in the install script, > which of course would be easy to keep in sync with whatever path udevd > uses. Whoa. I might concede the rest of my argument, but we NEVER EVER EVER touch running programs on an Arch system. Ever. -Dan
