Am 08.10.2013 11:40, schrieb Maxime Gauduin: > On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:11 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: >> Am 08.10.2013 11:03, schrieb Allan McRae: >>> Not sure if anyone is actually dealing with ABS patches these days, but >>> I would prefer just removing these prototypes altogether. VCS packages >>> are not particularly special these days. >> >> And yet, people are still submitting PKGBUILDs to AUR based on the old >> broken prototypes. And there is a lack of examples. >> >> > > It's true they are not much different from regular PKGBUILDs now. The > new source array capabilities and pkgver() function (just realized I > forgot to add the pkgver line in the protos, will correct that if we > keep those protos) are well documented on [1]. Maybe we could drop the > bzr, git, hg and svn protos and keep only cvs and darcs until they are > supported in pacman as well.
We could add a single prototype called PKGBUILD-everything.proto that contains examples for all special source array features in one prototype. That would make much more sense in my opinion.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
