On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:55 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 08.10.2013 11:40, schrieb Maxime Gauduin: > > On Tue, 2013-10-08 at 11:11 +0200, Thomas Bächler wrote: > >> Am 08.10.2013 11:03, schrieb Allan McRae: > >>> Not sure if anyone is actually dealing with ABS patches these days, but > >>> I would prefer just removing these prototypes altogether. VCS packages > >>> are not particularly special these days. > >> > >> And yet, people are still submitting PKGBUILDs to AUR based on the old > >> broken prototypes. And there is a lack of examples. > >> > >> > > > > It's true they are not much different from regular PKGBUILDs now. The > > new source array capabilities and pkgver() function (just realized I > > forgot to add the pkgver line in the protos, will correct that if we > > keep those protos) are well documented on [1]. Maybe we could drop the > > bzr, git, hg and svn protos and keep only cvs and darcs until they are > > supported in pacman as well. > > We could add a single prototype called PKGBUILD-everything.proto that > contains examples for all special source array features in one > prototype. That would make much more sense in my opinion. > >
Just PKGBUILD.proto may be a better choice. Either way, I'll compile the info on the VCS wiki and produce a new patch along those lines. -- Maxime
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
