Am 18.06.2012 20:57, schrieb Tom Gundersen: > Presumably, pacman won't be needed immediately on boot, so to appear a > bit more "snappy" i guess it would make sense to do the pacman-init in > the background. > > This would obviously only work if there is some lock in place to make > pacman wait on pacman-init to finish in a graceful way. Is this the > case?
I am not sure if this would be worth the possible trouble. In my vm this script finished in less than 1s. -- Pierre Schmitz, https://pierre-schmitz.com
