On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 9:01 PM, Pierre Schmitz <[email protected]> wrote: > Am 18.06.2012 20:57, schrieb Tom Gundersen: >> Presumably, pacman won't be needed immediately on boot, so to appear a >> bit more "snappy" i guess it would make sense to do the pacman-init in >> the background. >> >> This would obviously only work if there is some lock in place to make >> pacman wait on pacman-init to finish in a graceful way. Is this the >> case? > > I am not sure if this would be worth the possible trouble. In my vm > this script finished in less than 1s.
Ok, the generation of the entropy is faster than I expected. This could be a potential future optimization then, no need to worry about it now. -t
