Am 13.03.2013 00:32, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: > On 03/12/2013 03:24 PM, Hans Spath wrote: >> Hello, >> >> according to >> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archiso/ >> archiso is licensed under "GPL". >> >> Is that correct? What version? v1? v2? v2 or any later? v3? >> >> Regards, >> Hans Spath >> > > Hi > > I guess is GPL2. > > @Arch-Releng: right?
I think nobody ever cared about licensing. As it is, the archiso tree contains no license statement. I'd just use "GPL2 or later", but I don't know what the implications are. Or, as the number of authors is small, just ask everyone to relicense as WTFPL?
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
