On 03/13/2013 06:33 AM, Thomas Bächler wrote: > Am 13.03.2013 00:32, schrieb Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi: >> On 03/12/2013 03:24 PM, Hans Spath wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> according to >>> https://www.archlinux.org/packages/extra/any/archiso/ >>> archiso is licensed under "GPL". >>> >>> Is that correct? What version? v1? v2? v2 or any later? v3? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Hans Spath >>> >> >> Hi >> >> I guess is GPL2. >> >> @Arch-Releng: right? > > I think nobody ever cared about licensing. As it is, the archiso tree > contains no license statement. I'd just use "GPL2 or later", but I don't > know what the implications are. Or, as the number of authors is small, > just ask everyone to relicense as WTFPL? >
Just a personal preference, because of simplicy, ISC. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ISC_license -- Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi \cos^2\alpha + \sin^2\alpha = 1
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
