It is suggested to remove the old kde version before upgrading because
of a bug with pacman that affects KDE in particular.  Judd has posted a
nice explanation in the forums.

http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=10566&start=75


Eric

==============================================
Eric B�langer
D�partement de physique
Universit� de Montr�al
Bureau B-416, Pavillon Roger-Gaudry
T�l. : (514) 343-6111 ext. 8746
Courriel : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http://www.astro.umontreal.ca/~belanger/
==============================================

On Thu, 17 Mar 2005, Rosenstrauch, David wrote:

> 
> 
> > Exit KDE and from a console session, remove KDE with
> > 
> >         pacman -Rd kde
> > 
> > Then reinstall 3.4 with
> > 
> >         pacman -S kde
> 
> 
> Is it essential to do it this way?
> 
> I did a "pacman -Syu" (which upgraded, but broke, KDE) followed by a "pacman
> -S kde" (and responding yes to all the "already installed; upgrade anyway?"
> messages).
> 
> This did seem to work.  Anyone have any reason why this wouldn't be
> sufficient?
> 
> DR
> 
> 
> P.S.  I did experience one problem after the upgrade:  KDE's sound (arts or
> akodelib) is choppy on one of my PC's at home.  But I'm not sure that that
> problem is attributable to any error in the upgrade.  I'm guessing it's
> either: a) a bug in the new akodelib, or b) a problem with the kludgey new
> sound module my card needs (emu10k1x); that module is first appearing in
> 2.6.11, so maybe not all the kinks are worked out yet.  Problem is definitely
> KDE related, though, as XMMS didn't have any such problem.  I'm going to check
> out sound on a different box with a different card now, and see if maybe this
> is a module specific problem.  If anyone else is having sound problems with
> the new KDE, though, please do chime in.
> 
> ==============================================================================
> This message is for the sole use of the intended recipient. If you received
> this message in error please delete it and notify us. If this message was
> misdirected, CSFB does not waive any confidentiality or privilege. CSFB
> retains and monitors electronic communications sent through its network.
> Instructions transmitted over this system are not binding on CSFB until they
> are confirmed by us. Message transmission is not guaranteed to be secure.
> ==============================================================================
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> 


_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to