Actually, thats plenty of space.  I generally have 20G allocated for
/, but I'm generally at around 4G, including /home.  Infact I
recursively downloaded all arch packages, and it was just over 6G.

On 6/21/05, j l <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> --- Michael Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> > I have some questions about howto setup a (kinda)
> > optimal partitioning
> > for my 160GB (~153GB) harddrive
> >
> > I figured something like:
> > C:\    15GB  winXP ntfs
> > D:\    110 GB data fat32
> > /boot  64MB
> > /        15GB
> > /home 10GB
> >
> > My questions are as follows:
> > * Do I have enough room for arch?
> > * Should I have D as above or would it be better to
> > have one 100GB ntfs
> > partition and one 10-20GB fat32 partition for
> > exchanging data?
> >
> > greatful for all advice/hints
> >
> > /michael
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> >
> 200G partition:
> 
> hda1 32m dos /boot
> hda2 150G  / linux everything
> hda3 40g laptop backup image
> hda4 1g swap or something else
> 
> The 32m dos  /boot is all that is needed. Remember
> that using a journaled fs takes about 32m for the
> journal.
> 
> then some day when I get round to it, i will
> virtualize  hda1 and all those partitioning questions
> are out the window.
> 
> Talking of window, it is too much trouble and a total
> waste of time so i dont know anything about it and I
> cant help you there.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> ____________________________________________________
> Yahoo! Sports
> Rekindle the Rivalries. Sign up for Fantasy Football
> http://football.fantasysports.yahoo.com
> 
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to