Hold on - if it was a GPL package wouldn't the license be in /usr/share/licenses/common/GPL
;) > -----Original Message----- > From: Jason Chu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 26 July 2005 15:25 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [arch] License field in PKGBUILDs > > On Tue, Jul 26, 2005 at 02:10:38PM +0100, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > I have updated the doc on the new wiki as a said I would but I need some > more clarification. > > > > Where the doc say "include license file(s) in > /usr/share/licenses/<pkgname>" I assumed this meant inside > > a dir called pkgname - but that might be incorrect? What should be > called pkgname: the license file > > itself or the dir the license file goes in? It must be the latter if > there are going to be cases with > > more than one license but then what should the license files be called? > > > > Also the doc is currently in html format - would it be better to > completely wiki-fy it then have Dusty > > convert it later for the sake of readability in the short term? > > > > http://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Packaging_Standards > > The license is a file inside a directory named <pkgname>. If we were to > use the GPL as an example, it'd be something like, > /usr/share/licenses/glibc/COPYING. > > Jason > > -- > If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, > things are just as they are. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
