I need to point out that Judd has probably wiped his hands clean of this thread. You people are getting nowhere.
/me puts on his "in defense of bfinch" hat You want documentation? Do it yourself, just like the PPC port, x86_64 port, Archie, and other misc projects. Like someone above stated, Arch doesn't get in the way. So please make sure the users don't get in the way either. This is not your distro, this is Judd's. As with most OSS projects, it was made to "scratch an itch" - if you have a different "itch", scratch it yourself. I stated it before - quit whining and do something about it. This discussion is reminiscent of the old days with ...ahem.... someone who is no longer here. The best thing I ever heard about that person is "He's contributed alot to arch.... alot of unwavering opinions". Don't be that guy. Don't sit back and complain without at least trying to do *something*. If you want something changed, then change it. Your mommy doesn't live here, and *I'm* certainly not going to do your laundry for you. Christ. It's one complaint after another. First pacman is wrong and broken and *must* include all these features that could be done in about 10 lines of shell script and will probably be used by no one except the original poster. Second, we need documentation (old hat, as Bob said) which is stricly against the Arch "Mission Statement" (stealing verbage from iphitus) - why not go all they way against it, we'll switch it to i386 optimized and use slapt-get and patch everything all to hell! And now, as if there wasn't enough cruft in this ML thread, we have to go and complain about KDE artwork. It's almost like you people are looking for something to complain about. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
