or even better.... (patch attached)
Regardless of whether Judd makes a similar change upstream is there any
reason why I can't patch my own makepkg in this way? Is there some as
yet unforseen problem? I don't think so - seems very simple.
Phil
Douglas Soares de Andrade wrote:
Hi !
To recompile, bump the pkgrel and add:
find $startdir/pkg -name '*.la' -exec rm {} \;
at end of PKGBUILD to remove libtool files. This should work unless they
need to be patch for gcc4.
The line "find $startdir/pkg -name '*.la' -exec rm {} \;" could not be
executed directly from makepkg ?
What i mean is that changing all the PKGBUILDs just to add this line at the
end is so much work.
And since we dont want more libtool crap, i see that it a good idea to makepkg
do it for us.
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
--- /usr/bin/makepkg 2005-09-16 19:25:37.000000000 +0100
+++ /usr/bin/makepkg.new 2005-10-01 02:06:03.000000000 +0100
@@ -622,6 +622,10 @@
fi
fi
+# remove libtool files
+msg "Removing libtool files..."
+find pkg -name '*.la' -exec rm {} \;
+
# compress man pages
msg "Compressing man pages..."
find $startdir/pkg/{usr{,/local,/share},opt/*}/man -type f 2>/dev/null | while
read i ; do
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
