On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 10:29:59AM -0700, eliott wrote: > What happens if during a long running period, you restart a daemon. Then > it throws off your timestamp. Daemons are again shutdown in an order > different than they started in.
Leaving things the way they are also doesn't help this. Just because the proposed solution doesn't cover every possible case doesn't mean it isn't good. It's still an improvement over what currently exists. Usually when you have to restart one daemon that is a dependency of other ones, you have to restart those ones as well. I think it's a good idea to include. +1 Jason -- If you understand, things are just as they are. If you do not understand, things are just as they are.
pgpSgW2HCZr30.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
