On Sunday 30 October 2005 14:09, Tobias Powalowski wrote:
> > Hello,
> > Does this means that you have removed all IDE support from the kernel?
> > Wouldn't it be better to include support for the simplest system in the
> > kernel, so that no initrd would be needed for typical systems?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Dimitris
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > arch mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
> Hi
> define typical system ;)
> everyone will tell you something different about it.
> 
> let me list some benefits of initrd:
> you are able to boot from what you want, think of USB/FW SATA,IDE ,SCSI
> ability to enable cryptfs support etc.
> It will add more flexibility to Archlinux boot process.
> Less maintance work needs to be done. 
> It was on 0.8 roadmap, atm it looks good to be included in 0.7.1.
> Me had the time to hack on it, it's not perfect yet but that's the reason 
for 
> the big testing phase that will come now. The more will help us on this task 
> the better the result will be.
> 
> One major problem:
> The user needs to add the initrd to the bootloader, but this is the only 
one.
> New installers will have this in their new grub/lilo setup after install, 
when 
> 0.7.1 is released.
> 
> So don't be sceptic about the new kernel, in the end we all will benefit 
from 
> it.
> Don't forget the basic setup atm is to include all modules, so noone should 
> run into trouble if the bootloader is set up correct.
> greetings
> tpowa
> -- 
> Tobias Powalowski
> Archlinux Package Maintainer (tpowa)
> http://www.archlinux.org
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 

Well, generally, I am open to change. Change is generally a good thing in that 
we are able to move forward from the "Normal" way of doing things and 
expand...

I was wondering if this was going to affect the ARCHCK kernel when iphitus 
releases the 2.6.14-ARCHCK1.

Thanks!!!

Joe

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to