OK - now I think my original thought which is that there are four separate CVSROOTs - is that correct? Does cvsup only work if you have separate ROOT rather than modules?
Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: >Hello all, > >I would still like some one to help explain how ABS works with CVS. The >way I can see it each repo is actually stored in CVS as a module and >then the supfiles checkout the contents of that module as desired - is >that correct? > >I now have access to whole CVS root so I can add as many modules/repos >as I want to, handy for a testing repo for my huge dev team...of just me... > >Any explaination would be great, > >Phil > >Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > > >>We have finally got set up with our hosting solution for AEGIS and I >>am now looking at setting up an ABS-like CVS repository. I'm not sure >>how possible this will be because it looks like the Arch CVS repo has >>four dedicated roots, whereas we have been assigned a module in the >>projects root (as I understand) it. I imagine an ABS like approach >>might still be possible but I'll need some help understanding how the >>Arch repos have been structured vs "normal" CVS. I don't even know if >>we will be able to use CVS up or not? My normal method of >>experimentation is kind of out here as we don't have demo cvs to play >>with... >> >>Phil >> >>_______________________________________________ >>arch mailing list >>[email protected] >>http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch >> >> >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >arch mailing list >[email protected] >http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
