> I agree here too. > --Not every computer has 24/7 internet connectivity. > --Some people really like emacs > --X is not running on some servers, and reading docs through lynx/links > is not as convenient as info. > > As for the small package size, if it is that important we could create > seperate packages with info documentation. What do you think? >
Well I tried to work out a happy middle ground, but it went unanswered. Most packages that include an info also include a basic man that works fine. For the handfull of packages that ONLY provide an info, why dont we use info2man which I put in the AUR earlier to convert it at the makepkg? Then we get no info pages, people get their man pages, and everyone is happy. James Rayner -- iphitus - archck maintainer Home:iphitus.loudas.com Blog: iphitus.blogspot.com _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
