I really *like* this idea. Bob Finch
>> I agree here too. >> --Not every computer has 24/7 internet connectivity. >> --Some people really like emacs >> --X is not running on some servers, and reading docs through >> lynx/links is not as convenient as info. >> >> As for the small package size, if it is that important we could create >> seperate packages with info documentation. What do you think? >> > > Well I tried to work out a happy middle ground, but it went unanswered. > > Most packages that include an info also include a basic man that works > fine. > > For the handfull of packages that ONLY provide an info, why dont we use > info2man which I put in the AUR earlier to convert it at the > makepkg? > > Then we get no info pages, people get their man pages, and everyone is > happy. > > James Rayner > > -- > iphitus - archck maintainer > Home:iphitus.loudas.com Blog: iphitus.blogspot.com > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
