Dimitrios Apostolou wrote:

>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>  
>
>>Hey Ken and the gang;
>>    
>>
>
>we are no gang, we don't even know each other. It's the common need that 
>unites us.
>
>  
>
>>Life seems to be difficult for you Ken when you are told something is the
>>way the designers wished, and the developers want; and it does not suit
>>you.
>>
>>There are plenty of other linux distros where you can go complain about
>>what they have decided to put into their distributions.
>>
>>Decisions at ANY endeavor in life are made by those that do the work or
>>pay for the work to be done. Here is not the place to complain about that
>>either.
>>
>>i.e. Please go find another place to be a whiny-baby and quit cluttering
>>up my mailbox.
>>
>>    
>>
>
>Please stop being aggresive. This is not you list. We have the right to 
>bring to the surface any (serious) subject we like, either you like it 
>or not. Stop attacking people because your opinions don't match.
>
>Even if lack of info docs is a design choice, there is a fair amount of 
>people that thinks it is a bad choice. Is it that bad to *discuss* about 
>changing a design choice _peacefully_?
>  
>
Is it bad to read the archives to see how many times this has been 
discussed before?

>Dimitris
>
>
>  
>
>>Thank you very much.
>>
>>Very best regards;
>>
>>Bob Finch
>>
>>    
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>arch mailing list
>[email protected]
>http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
>
>  
>

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to