On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 08:41:58PM -0200, Newton B. Costa Junior wrote: > http://linux.slashdot.org/linux/05/11/23/1744237.shtml?tid=166&tid=106 > > Funny thing is that Arch Linux is mentioned on the first post!! > And even the wiki is mentioned! >
Glad to see someone writing something to negate the "negative effect" of the first article, whose author is a total doorknob. And having used slackware since 1997, I found that the original article "Does Slackware still matter?" had the look and feel of something written by someone who got frustrated because they have no clue what they're doing, and their poor little under-developed brain cannot grasp the whole thing that Slackware is. -- --- Martin Lefebvre (dadexter _at_ gmail _dot_ com) Linux/i686 2.4.31 celeborn (Slackware 10.2.0) 07:01:37 up 15 days, 7:17, 8 users, load average: 0.08, 0.23, 1.36 _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
