Thank you Judd, that made all the frustration from my alsa problems just dissolve away.
On Sun, 27 Nov 2005 13:59:51 -0800 Judd Vinet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Dear Customer, > > Thank you for your kind words and suggestions. We are obligated to > fulfill your every need, and will dutifully change our course to match > your expectations. Your tireless constructive criticism is a greater > boon to this project than anyone else, and we will continue to strive > towards your benevolent and well-delivered expectations. > > Given your current record for diplomacy and public relations, we will > continue to take your suggestions with the highest regard. It's only > fair, seeing as you take the time to write to us whenever something > doesn't agree with you, and you are very adept at wording things in just > such a way that we immediately have an urge to move your requests to the > top of the pile. > > Our volunteers apoligize profusely for any problems or annoyances you > may have been caused when using this entirely free product. Once again > we have failed you, and as such, will issue a refund as soon as humanly > possible. > > > Sincerely, > > The Management. > > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2005 at 09:45:13PM +0000, Philip Dillon-Thiselton wrote: > > Why the hell does hwdetect have to be in the initscripts pkg if it is > > going to need so many updates? Generally I am pretty understanding of > > the devs and their odd whims but this one takes the biscuit. I could > > not give two shits about hwdetect and certainly don't want it on my > > system if I don't need it and I certainly don't want to have to mess > > about with the inevitable .pacnew files everyday just because hwdetect > > is being updated. Aside from all that it's a PITA for me and the > > gensplah initscripts - I have to update the whole pkg when hwdetect gets > > fixed and that should be handled entirely separately. Why on earth > > can't hwdetect run using a daemon like hotplug rather than having it > > hardcoded and then be totally optional. Quite frankly I'm amazed. > > > > I guess it would be less annoying if hwdetect wasn't a) so buggy b) > > reinventing the wheel and c) anti the Arch ethos. > > > > Sort it out, please. > > > > Phil > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
