I was asked by a boost user to add jam/bjam to boost. I was unaware there was a standalone package. The boost jam version is newer, 3.1.11, but I'm guessing it's not the same codebase.
I'll do the conflicts/provides thing and upload -4. sigh. k On Sat, 2006-02-04 at 22:41 +0000, Joao Estevao wrote: > http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3898 > > On 2/4/06, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Yeah, looks like the new boost provides Boost.Jam which is a > > replacement for jam. I guess it should conflict and provide it. > > > > On 2/4/06, Damir Perisa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > boost: /usr/bin/jam: exists in filesystem > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] damir]# pacman -Qo /usr/bin/jam > > > /usr/bin/jam is owned by jam 2.5-1 > > > > > > (i wanted to rebuild source-highlight that depends on =boost-1.33.1-2) > > > > > > - D > > > > > > -- > > > Ask the Wombat! > > > > > > Q: What is a kiss? > > > A: Well, this basically sums up your average Internet user, right > > > there. > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > arch mailing list > > > [email protected] > > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > arch mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > > > > > -- > A mind all logic is like a knife all blade. > It makes the hand bleed that uses it. > > -- Rabindranath Tagore (1861-1941) > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
