Damir,
There's already a bugtracker incident filed for the issue.. it's
been there for a while, and someone in the comments posted a proposed
fix... let me find the URL...
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/3706 -- that's the one.
-- Cerebral
Damir Perisa wrote:
> Tuesday 14 February 2006 15:01, Travis Willard wrote:
> | Damir Perisa wrote:
> | > but as it works for me on all readers i have, i don't care about
> | > this details ;-)
> |
> | Firefox, Thunderbird, and RSSOwl all refuse to read it because of
> | this - some aggrigators are awfully picky. :P
>
> seen this way, i think i was very lucky on this things ;-)
>
> so what would be a working solution? what needs to be fixed? if we
> have a detailed summary on what to change with what i can then tell
> somebody who is in charge to do this change. i think this would be
> fastest, as hardly a dev has time to run after this matter if xorg7
> and other things are waiting for arch. however, if there is a clean
> and ready-to-use solution, i'm sure it will be applied immediately.
>
> anyone?
>
> - D
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
