Well I've heard rummors that arch migh to go svn so if that true it might be pretty pointless.
On 2/19/06, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:51:43 -0500 > matthew g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hello, > > What License is abs under? Would I be able to modify it and then post > > it to the community? Now why the hell would I want to do this? Well > > because as most of you know cvsup will not work on a x86_64 platform > > though csup will which is a cvsup clone. So I just wanted to modify > > the lines that use cvsup and change it to csup and a few option which > > don't work with csup. > > > > Before I postet csup on AUR I tried to use it with ABS. It works with > some very small adjustments. (csup dont now what -r is) > IMHO csup should replace cvsup unless there is a good reason not to. > > -- > cso > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
