On 2/19/06, matthew g <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well I've heard rummors that arch migh to go svn so if that true it
might be pretty pointless.
On 2/19/06, Christer Solskogen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2006 11:51:43 -0500
> matthew g < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> > What License is abs under? Would I be able to modify it and then post
> > it to the community? Now why the hell would I want to do this? Well
> > because as most of you know cvsup will not work on a x86_64 platform
> > though csup will which is a cvsup clone. So I just wanted to modify
> > the lines that use cvsup and change it to csup and a few option which
> > don't work with csup.
> >
>
> Before I postet csup on AUR I tried to use it with ABS. It works with
> some very small adjustments. (csup dont now what -r is)
> IMHO csup should replace cvsup unless there is a good reason not to.
>
> --
> cso
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
--
Matthew | Website http://msg43.net | AIM: MSG431 | MSN + Gmail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
--
Rohan Dhruva
Proud GNU/Linux user.
Windows: "Where do you want to go today?"
Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?"
FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?"
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
