[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> On Fri, 24 Mar 2006 10:07:46 +0000 >> Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> Sander has just raised this on the forum - >>> >>> http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?t=19925 >>> >>> and I thought I'd bring it to the list as well. Are any of the devs >>> aware of this already? Whether they are or not, what's the protocol in >>> situations like this? >>> >>> Tom K. >>> >> I'm not fully following you here... >> >> Because it's i686 optimized, tries to stay bleeding edge but fairly >> stable and fast, lightweight, and flexible it has to be a rip off of >> Arch? Or are you complaining that they ripped off our wording? >> >> From what I can tell, it uses a different package manager. For someone >> to have ripped us off, they'd have to convert a good chunk of our >> packages over to their own format. Why bother? >> >> Now, if you're just complaining about the words, I'm pretty sure Judd >> hasn't trademarked "fast, lightweight, and flexible", "bleeding edge", >> "stable", or "i686", so I don't understand what the issue is... >> >> Jason >> > > > Jason is right, Judd did not copyright/trademark those things. > > I DID. > > So.....you all owe me BIG BUCKS, and I will be coming to your town soon to > collect. > > For Hedinux, it's BIG EUROS, and you'll need to write your threatening letters in French.
(This thread is becoming pointless - what kind of an eejit started it? :P ) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
