[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Perhaps I should have mentioned this earlier..... > > I have recently (past several months) tried reiser4 and had a complete > failure. This was while using the underground-desktop Linux distro: a > derivative of arch-Linux. > > Anyways, I found it somewhat curious that the distro's head honcho ALSO > decided (without ANY of my input BTW,) to forgo reiser4 and switch to > reiser3 (due to unexpected problems/behavior) at about the same time I had > my partition "disappear" after a controlled and planned "shutdown -h now". > <- Please note this was not due to using the "tools". > > So....you all have been warned. Twice now from me as well as from others.
Interesting. My experiences were with reiser3. Perhaps that's a bit more stable than 4. Anyway, thanks for the heads-up. DR _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
