On 5/4/06, Aaron Griffin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/3/06, Rohan Dhruva <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > dont compare with any distro, it just gives some people > > here a reason to bash ubuntu and canonical, and not talk > > about the point itself. > > It's rather obvious you're referring to me. Can you please point out > where I "bashed" Ubuntu and Canonical. I will rescind my comment > then.
No, I am not referring to you, phrak. There have been one or two people who started this "Canonical people pay them, we dont get money". I am _not_ specifically pointing at you .. and, it was a mistake on part of the original poster too, to compare with ubuntu. Or any other distro. As I said, he could have just said that "Pkg foo is out of date", and even before that, he should have _searched_ the mailing list -- I had posted a similar message to the ML about python sometime ago, too. > > In addition, after scanning the other 6 paragraphs I wrote that do not > mention Ubuntu or Canonical, I am lapse to find how I skirted the > issue, as you so imply. > Well, sorry if I sounded like that, I didnt mean to point fingers at you, specifically. Rohan. -- Rohan Dhruva Proud GNU/Linux user. Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming or what?" http://www.dhruva.be/ _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
