[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Tue, 16 May 2006 23:57:14 +0200, Thomas Bächler > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb: >> >>> buuut, i just changed the pkgver and removed the md5sums from the >>> pkgbuild >>> in abs and built from that one, so my wine 0.9.13 which has the force >>> flag >>> sat to 'y' still shouldn't be "upgraded" by an older release, should it? >>> Because that would be a bug wouldn't it? >>> >> The force-flag doesn't affect the package, it only affects the repo you >> put the package in. So you >> will still be forced to 0.9.11 (which was originally done because 0.9.12 >> was only trouble). >> >> > > hmm, you know what would be cool? To be able to somehow inform users about > why given > package isn't updated yet, because I just assumed it was due to lazyness > or something. > > new mailing-list? "package-problems" or something? > > Subject: Wine on hold > > Reason: Ie doesn't work anymore, + X other reasons (where you would fill > in X) > > What do you think? Asking too much? Just get used to it? > >
The reason is given in CVS: "forced downgrade, due to many issues with 0.9.12" Personally, I don't see the need to a new ML. Lazyness or something? That's the second time I've seen someone say something like that about the dev team. FFS ....... _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
