Derek Carlson wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>   
>> This is anecdotal at this point, but I seem to be having problems with SAMBA 
>> after upgrading to the Testing.  I cannot see the local network, nor mount 
>> network volumes.
>>
>> I am able to boot and access the WAN.  I also submitted the inventory as 
>> requested, but I did not notice anything suspicious in the files regarding 
>> SAMBA.  I have not changed the configuration file, or any other systems on 
>> the network.  Other Arch machines (upgraded to Current) are still OK.
>>
>> Is the a problem that anyone else has seen, or is it a knowing issue?
>>
>> Kind regards.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> arch mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>>
>>   
>>     
> I am still having problems.  The madwifi drivers were downloaded again, 
> and recompiled against the kernel from testing.
>
> These were recompiled and installed, after stopping samba, cups and the 
> network.  I restarted the network with the new drivers, then restarted 
> samba and cups.
>
> Samba says that it starts successfully (DONE), as does cups, but when I 
> try to mount the network volume, it fails with :2966: Connection to 
> host1 failed
>
> If I run smb4k, now local area network is found.  I can ping google, and 
> otherwise use the internet, so the basic network connection seems sound.
>
> Other Arch systems on the local network are able to connect to the samba 
> server without difficulty.  From systems within the recognized LAN, they 
> can see each other but not the affected system.
>
> I've not changed the samba.conf file on this system, or any other.  
> Prior to upgrade to Testing, the samba volumes mounted OK from this 
> workstation.
>
> Does anyone have anything to suggest?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> arch mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
>
>   
Is anyone using SAMBA and the Testing repository right now?

I'm considering downgrading to current, but I'd rather push forward.  
I'm happy to offer whatever I can in the way of providing information, 
but it's beyond my technical skills to diagnose much further than I 
already have.

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to