Στις Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:51:29 +0100 Ο/Η Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε:
> James wrote: > > Moving 2.6.17 in, would mean moving in gcc4.1 > > To clarify - are you saying I can't build 2.6.17 without gcc 4.1? If > so, why not? > I think he means that, because 2.6.17 in testing is built with gcc 4.1, any other third party module will have to be built with the same compiler. Thus, if kernel move to current, gcc must come with it to enable people that use non-provided modules compile them for the kernel. -- Stavros Giannouris Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Hello. I'm a signature virus. Just copy me to your signature to help me spread"
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
