Stavros Giannouris wrote: > Στις Sun, 18 Jun 2006 17:51:29 +0100 > Ο/Η Tom K <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> έγραψε: > > >> James wrote: >> >>> Moving 2.6.17 in, would mean moving in gcc4.1 >>> >> To clarify - are you saying I can't build 2.6.17 without gcc 4.1? If >> so, why not? >> >> > I think he means that, because 2.6.17 in testing is built with gcc 4.1, > any other third party module will have to be built with > the same compiler. > Thus, if kernel move to current, gcc must come with it to enable people > that use non-provided modules compile them for the kernel. >
Thanks Stravros. That's what I thought he meant too, but I just wanted to be sure. I'm building 2.6.17-ck1 now with gcc 4.0 anyway. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
