On 1/1/07, ded <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 01, 2007 at 11:49:25PM +0800, Rock Feng wrote:
> On 2007/01/01 ?? 13:38:05, Rodrigo Coacci wrote:
> >I've noticed that almost any command I give to pacman takes much more
time than
> >it used to take, and that became to happen after I upgraded it. Is that
just me
> >or someone else can confirm it?
> >
> Pacman,emm...slow always :)
I haven't noticed any noticeable decrease in the speed of pacman since the
upgrade. As a side note, I'm quite impressed with pacman overall. I
moved from Debian after many years to FC5 and, to me, yum leaves a
lot to be desired. Pacman is like a breath of fresh air, and one of
the deciding factors to settle on Arch as my new distro of choice.
Dan
Yes compared to debian (and derivatives) Arch is a breeze in EVERYTHING....
With RPM tools it isn't even fair to compare... :-P
That's why I love it.
But as i'm using Arch for a year or so, I can tell you that previous
versions of were (apparently at least) faster.
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
--
Abraços,
Rodrigo
_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
