On 3/7/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thanks for the response! We are glad it is working just fine for a lot > of people, it makes us feel pretty confident about releasing soon.
Hi! I installed the version 3 too and would like to say that it it very fast and the interface is very good. It just had a thing I would like to tell: when I updated the system with the new version, it said that KNemo had conflicts with some files (some icons and language translations). That is ok, I suppose. I installed one older version some time ago with a self made package and probably I did something wrong. I just would like to suggest that the error message could be formated in a way that the central problem could be more easily distinguished from the details. In that case, it took some time to understand that the problem was just a file conflict. Unfortunately, I don't have the error output right now (I rebooted to use the new kernel), but I hope you understand. Apart from that, everything is so much better: * faster (very faster, right after I hit enter, it was asking me Update (Y/N)) * the new progress bar is more interesting. Being bigger, it can be updated more often. * the time estimated is more accurate. In the version 2, some estimated times were not reliable. I would suggest one thing that was asked some time ago. It would be nice to have the size of each package in the first listing before the update confirmation. It may be through some extra parameter, I don't mind. But is an information that I would like to see before hitting Y. Thank you guys for the wonderful work! -- ------------------------------------------- Denis A. Altoe Falqueto ------------------------------------------- _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://www.archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
