* Aaron Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On 5/1/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 5/1/07, Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I got pacman 3.03 from testing, but no manpage found? > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man pacman > > > No manual entry for pacman > > > > > > anybody else have that problem? > > > > Check your permissions on the directory in /usr/man. You will probably > > see some that got messed up, its related to a bug in the coreutils > > package that has since been fixed. pacman 3.0.1 was the culprit as far > > as we can tell. You should be able to fix the permissions and access > > ALL manpages again (pacman is not the only one that is broken). > > According to cactus, 3.0.3-1 had the permission issue. I've thrown a > 3.0.3-2 package up there which was a simple rebuild with valid > permissions I just updated the system again and it pulled pacman 3.0.3-2 but I still have the same problem. what should the permissions be on /usr/man/ ? this is what I have
drwxr-xr-x 53 root root 4.0K 2007-04-28 09:36 man/ isnt' read and execute enough to use man pages? > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch -- Eric Dan [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
