On 5/2/07, Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > * Aaron Griffin ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > On 5/1/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 5/1/07, Eric Dan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I got pacman 3.03 from testing, but no manpage found? > > > > > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ man pacman > > > > No manual entry for pacman > > > > > > > > anybody else have that problem? > > > > > > Check your permissions on the directory in /usr/man. You will probably > > > see some that got messed up, its related to a bug in the coreutils > > > package that has since been fixed. pacman 3.0.1 was the culprit as far > > > as we can tell. You should be able to fix the permissions and access > > > ALL manpages again (pacman is not the only one that is broken). > > > > According to cactus, 3.0.3-1 had the permission issue. I've thrown a > > 3.0.3-2 package up there which was a simple rebuild with valid > > permissions > I just updated the system again and it pulled pacman 3.0.3-2 but I still > have the same problem. > what should the permissions be on /usr/man/ ? > this is what I have > > drwxr-xr-x 53 root root 4.0K 2007-04-28 09:36 man/ > > isnt' read and execute enough to use man pages?
Check the subdirectories of /usr/man, that is where the problems were seen (man3, man8, etc.). -Dan _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
