On 5/7/07, Pierre Schmitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Montag, 7. Mai 2007 22:27:45 schrieb Dan McGee: > > If there are no objections in the next half-day or so, we (Aaron and > > I) would like to push pacman 3 to current. This is the only possible > > showstopper I know of that is not fixed in 3.0.3: > > <http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7063> > > It is easily patched on the package building end, rather than release > > a 3.0.4 release. > > > > Let us know ASAP if this shouldn't happen tonight. > > > > -Dan > > What about the serverside parts and communitypkg, AUR etc.? Do they work with > the new naming scheme (including the architecture)?
Not yet, and that's on purpose. At the rate people update we should probably wait a few weeks to ensure everyone is off of pacman 2.X. Think about it this way: if we change the repo format, pacman 2.X users wouldn't be able to upgrade to 3.0 _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
