On 5/7/07, bardo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/7/07, Dan McGee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * The pacman package and its deps (libarchive, libdownload) should be > > renamed for the foreseeable future to the old style name (without the > > arch) on our server in order to allow people to upgrade these first, > > and then upgrade the rest of their system. > > Is there any server-side way to understand which pacman version is connecting?
That might be possible, but at the same time, it's almost needless complication. I think we might be able to get away with providing the deps as Dan suggests, or even a special package with the static binary and support files so that users can still upgrade from 2.X to 3.0 for a while... Hmmm, I think we need to think about this upgrade path just a tad more. _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
