On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007 11:36 Mircea Bardac wrote: Hi, at first sorry, that i missed the discussion here and so i comment the bugreport (http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7135) instead of writing my lines here.
> Interesting news on the laptop power saving front (see below). Could it be that this will be a better idea for the kernel26suspend2 package instead of the official kernel26 package? > Since I mentioned already a kernel config option, I might as well add a > request for CONFIG_USB_SUSPEND=y, since I've noticed a recommendation of > enabling it in a screenshot on: http://www.linuxpowertop.org/powertop.php Hmm, the site seems to be down but okay what i want to say is that not everybody need a "significant overhead" as said in the documentation of hrtimer. And what i miss a little bit here is the willingness to make an own kernel package where this option is enabled and to report that PowerTOP is so nice as described without breaking something else. Common it is only a few days old that here was discussed about the time problems of the devs and now we the kernel maintainer should experiment with an option where the own document says that "It is not intended for production usage". But don't see this comment too hard because it is only my 2 cents about it. See you, Attila _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
