On Thu, 17 May 2007 09:12:06 +0200 Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mittwoch, 16. Mai 2007 21:17 waldek wrote: > > > Let me explain then, I thought it was obvious :-) > > How does it compare to booting another kernel and downgrading the broken > > one? I don't even want to mention my dell notebook with external cd drive I > > can never find. > > IMO having two kernels is a quite clean solution but as I said that's my > > oppinion. I don't even want to mention finding out if some other problems > > are kernel related. > > I use the same because i have had some bad experiences with the distribution > what i used before arch which has only one kernel package. That's why i never > upgrade the running kernel and reboot to an other kernel before i want to do > this. I think it is a risk which is not necessary instead of it seems that > arch devs makes a very good job. But if a kernel panic happens after an > upgrade and you have to solve it than from my view you don't want it a second > time.-) So my hope is too that kernel26ck or another kernel package what is > most wanted will be survive in community. > Yes, I do agree. kernel-laptop -desktop -sever if you want my vote. BTW, Since we haven't supported 2.4 for a long time, why not remove 26 from the name?
> See you, Attila > > > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > [email protected] > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
