2007/7/10, Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Dienstag, 10. Juli 2007 20:56 Alexander Kuzmenkov wrote: > > > Of course, you need relink kvm module for new kernel (just rebuild your > > package). > > As described to the post of Douglas i have done this. But at this moment there > is no problem to wait that perhaps a person with more knowledge about kernel > modules get the same problem and find a solution.-) > > I recognize a difference in the kernel configs. In 2.6.21 CONFIG_PARAVIRT is > not set and in 2.6.22 it is set. Is there a reason to do this or an > oversight? It is still experimental and the help says that when run without a > hypervisor the kernel is theoretically slower. >
That was done intentionally. http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/7337 In practice, there is no difference in speed when running such kernel without a hipervisor. The positive is that it allows to greatly speed-up Arch under KVM, Xen and the latest VMware without the need for a separate kernel. -- Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич) _______________________________________________ arch mailing list [email protected] http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
