RedShift wrote:
> I agree with this one.
>
> eliott wrote:
>   
>> Note: Not in any way directed at you Roman. You are just the last
>> person on this thread so far..
>>
>> ### start rant
>>
>> I object.
>> This seems insane to me.
>>
>> Just use one web directory. If people install multiple web
>> servers..ok..bear with me..maybe they aren't idiots?
>>
>> Maybe people can even create their own directories if they want their
>> document root to be somewhere else.
>>
>> This isn't linux for idiots we are talking about here. This is arch.
>> And the proposed solution is... insane?
>>
>> Also..and this seems like a good time to throw this out there too..
>> Why in the hell are php apps in the package manager?
>>
>> Seems to be like a recipe for disaster. Anyone who installs web apps
>> (php especially) using a package manager is just asking for their web
>> apps to stop working (through no fault of the package manager).
>>
>> !boggle
Sorry I dont' see the need for this. Each webserver (or other daemon or 
server) has the directory structure it's authors devised by default. 
This can usually be customies by a Sys Admin to suit the directory 
structure that meets their organisations needs (and/or standards). As 
Apache uses documentroot to set the root directory of the web server, it 
can therefore have it anywhere - you don't need to use the default.

I don't /home is my biggest partition and the one I want to preserve 
between upgrades and distro changes etc.. so my docroot is /home/www 
with /home/www/html and /home/www/cgi-bin ..etc.. following this 
structure. Putting my production web server in /var with all the log 
files just didn't seem the right place to me (obviously the initial 
static web site apache creates by default is different).

Just my 2c worth

Russ

 

_______________________________________________
arch mailing list
arch@archlinux.org
http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch

Reply via email to