There's already some pkgbuilds for it. You can see the forum post for more information. (It's in contributions)
On 10/22/07, Travis Willard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 22 Oct 2007 10:56:54 -0500, Aaron Griffin wrote > > On 10/22/07, gan lu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Is there any plan to port pacman to support PackageKit? Just be curious. > > > > Erm, I don't believe Dan and I have ever heard of PackageKit. If you > > would LIKE this to happen, I'd suggest the following: > > > > a) Join the pacman-dev mailing list. > > b) Tell us why this is a good idea. > > c) Give us some pros/cons > > d) Patches are always welcome. > > As a point of note, NOTHING should need to be done to pacman - there is no > 'porting' pacman to support PackageKit, quite the opposite actually. Somebody > needs to take the time to write a PackageKit backend that supports libalpm. > > I originally had interest in this, but personal time constraints didn't allow > me, and I have since lost interest. Someone else, however, has started a > libalpm backend which is included in PackageKit's git repo - this is 'pacman' > support. Take a look at it and see what you can contribute, would be my > suggestion. > > -- > Travis > > _______________________________________________ > arch mailing list > arch@archlinux.org > http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch > -- Alex Heck - nesl247 _______________________________________________ arch mailing list arch@archlinux.org http://archlinux.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
