Livnat Peer wrote:
> I think you are describing a use case for separating the migration network > from the management network. > I see a reason for providing that, for example the use case you described > above. > I am curious if there is a use case to have more than one migration network > in a Cluser. Given that tenants do not explicitly request that their VMs be migrated I can't see charging for them. If there is no separate chargeback I do not see any benefit from having multiple migration networks. The management plane is already capable of favoring Platinum customers over Bronze customers without real-time support from the network. On the other hand there is clear value in preventing migration traffic from interfering with management traffic, for example cancelling a migration. _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
