On 01/21/2013 08:21 PM, Caitlin Bestler wrote: > Livnat Peer wrote: > > >> I think you are describing a use case for separating the migration network >> from the management network. >> I see a reason for providing that, for example the use case you described >> above. >> I am curious if there is a use case to have more than one migration network >> in a Cluser. > > Given that tenants do not explicitly request that their VMs be migrated I > can't see charging for them. > If there is no separate chargeback I do not see any benefit from having > multiple migration networks. > The management plane is already capable of favoring Platinum customers over > Bronze customers > without real-time support from the network. > > On the other hand there is clear value in preventing migration traffic from > interfering with management > traffic, for example cancelling a migration. > >
Thanks for your input Caitlin, I think that's a solid argument for avoiding the complexity of supporting multiple migration networks per cluster. _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
