----- Original Message ----- > From: "Ryan Barry" <[email protected]> > To: [email protected] > Sent: Monday, October 28, 2013 6:19:33 PM > Subject: Re: [node-devel] Needed: Node and Engine cooperation > > > On 10/28/2013 09:00 AM, [email protected] wrote: > > I do not see the benefit of this. All (non-wifi) nics of a host are > > reported by Vdsm to Engine and thus manage-able by the latter. > Part of the argument for this is for a non-VDSM node. We're already > shipping base node images, and any uptake (whether internal or external) > for another use may benefit. Not that we're currently doing it, but > Neutron/Quantum explicitly recommend having an unconfigured NIC for > tenant traffic, and a hypothetical Node+Nova+Neutron image would see a > large benefit from a configuration key which allowed some NICs to be > configured while leaving others (for GRE/VLAN tenant traffic) locked.
This is up to the administrator to decide / change. We cannot (and I think we should not) protect administrator from him-self. Once computer had been added to manager, it should be managed by manager, if administrator finds a reason to locally manage a centralized remote managed host, it is probably because there is some kind of problem. Regards, Alon _______________________________________________ Arch mailing list [email protected] http://lists.ovirt.org/mailman/listinfo/arch
