Dennis, Sorry to be so slow responding. Dublin Core seems like a very good place to start for documents. I was thinking of something along the lines of the FGDC geospatial metadata. Those are feature set level metadata, and are pretty elaborate, but a subset might be useful at the record level. The NPS is working on establishing cultural resources geospatial data transfer standards for federal agencies that will likely include some feature level metadata, but those will be in development for some time yet I think.
Brian On Saturday, February 8, 2014 12:57:42 PM UTC-5, Dennis Wuthrich wrote: > > Hi Brian, > > Welcome to the Arches forum. > > Good question on record-level metadata. At the moment, you would need to > edit the graphs to support the kind of metadata (e.g.: accuracy of > geometries) that you are talking about. > > We are starting to think about record-level metadata for an upcoming > version of Arches (specifically for images and documents), so it would be > good to hear what your particular requirements are. > > FYI, we're looking at Dublin Core for the image/document metadata... > > Cheers, > > Dennis > > On Thursday, February 6, 2014 7:43:47 AM UTC-8, Brian Crane wrote: >> >> Is there a way to capture/report metadata associated with the records? >> I'm particularly thinking about mapping methods used to record site >> location and estimates of completeness and accuracy. >> > -- -- To post, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe, send email to [email protected]. For more information, visit https://groups.google.com/d/forum/archesproject?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Arches Project" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
